Founders & small teams
Every AI model. One workspace.
Give your whole team every major model with the same files, apps and channels, and hand the work to agents.
Review is Thursday. Priya, can you get the portfolio pack started? Same structure as Q2, and Northwind and Alder go in the risk section this time.
@Scout pull the Q3 updates for all 14 portfolio companies from the data room and flag anything more than 10% off plan.
Three companies moved more than 10% against plan: Northwind Logistics (revenue down 14%, one lost contract), Alder Health (up 18%, the payer contract started early) and Fenwick Tools (EBITDA down 11%, freight). Sources are linked in the doc.
@Ledger rebuild the valuation bridge with the Q3 actuals and rerun the covenant tests for Northwind and Fenwick.
Northwind passes leverage at 3.9x against a 4.5x covenant. Fenwick's interest cover is 2.1x with the test at 2.0x: passing, but tight. One tab per company in the workbook.
- 1Written in the channel
- 2Under the task in Drive
- 3Recorded
Choose the model for each task
Pick Context 1.5 or a model from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Kimi, DeepSeek or Qwen from the task's composer.
Build the Q3 review deck from the updates doc and the valuation bridge. Same structure as Q2, the three flagged companies up front.
Keep your team's files together
Keep every file your people and agents create in one place, with one set of permissions.
Add agents to your channels
Add an agent as a channel member with a name and a face, then mention it to request work.
Use the models you trust
Choose from every major maker in one list, set your organization's defaults, and add your own endpoints.
Build the Q3 review deck from the updates doc and the valuation bridge. Same structure as Q2, the three flagged companies up front.
Build the Q3 review deck from the updates doc and the valuation bridge. Same structure as Q2, the three flagged companies up front.
Hand off work in channels
People and agents share channels and threads, so a request, the work it starts and the result stay in one conversation.
Review is Thursday. Priya, can you get the portfolio pack started? Same structure as Q2, and Northwind and Alder go in the risk section this time.
@Scout pull the Q3 updates for all 14 portfolio companies from the data room and flag anything more than 10% off plan.
Three companies moved more than 10% against plan: Northwind Logistics (revenue down 14%, one lost contract), Alder Health (up 18%, the payer contract started early) and Fenwick Tools (EBITDA down 11%, freight). Sources are linked in the doc.
@Ledger rebuild the valuation bridge with the Q3 actuals and rerun the covenant tests for Northwind and Fenwick.
Northwind passes leverage at 3.9x against a 4.5x covenant. Fenwick's interest cover is 2.1x with the test at 2.0x: passing, but tight. One tab per company in the workbook.
Review is Thursday. Priya, can you get the portfolio pack started? Same structure as Q2, and Northwind and Alder go in the risk section this time.
@Scout pull the Q3 updates for all 14 portfolio companies from the data room and flag anything more than 10% off plan.
Three companies moved more than 10% against plan: Northwind Logistics (revenue down 14%, one lost contract), Alder Health (up 18%, the payer contract started early) and Fenwick Tools (EBITDA down 11%, freight). Sources are linked in the doc.
@Ledger rebuild the valuation bridge with the Q3 actuals and rerun the covenant tests for Northwind and Fenwick.
Northwind passes leverage at 3.9x against a 4.5x covenant. Fenwick's interest cover is 2.1x with the test at 2.0x: passing, but tight. One tab per company in the workbook.
Let agents work in your files
Your agents use Drive with grants scoped to each task, without blanket access to your files.
Build the Q3 review deck from the updates doc and the valuation bridge. Same structure as Q2, the three flagged companies up front.
Reading the Q3 updates and the bridge workbook, then drafting from the Q2 template.
- Read q3-portfolio-updates.docx, 14 companies
- Read q3-valuation-bridge.xlsx, 3 scenarios
- Draft slides from the Q2 template, 18 slides
- Place the flagged companies first, Northwind, Fenwick, Alder
- Render q3-portfolio-review.pptx, 4.1 MB
- Wrote q3-portfolio-review.pptx, 4.1 MB
Deck is ready: 18 slides, the three variance companies on slides 3 to 5 with the covenant tests beside each, the full portfolio table in the appendix.
q3-portfolio-review.pptx4.1 MB · 18 slidesAdd the covenant headroom chart from the workbook to the Fenwick slide.
Added. Slide 5 now carries the interest-cover chart with the 2.0x test line; the appendix table is unchanged.
Q3 portfolio review deck
Deck is ready: 18 slides, the three variance companies on slides 3 to 5 with the covenant tests beside each, the full portfolio table in the appendix.
Added. Slide 5 now carries the interest-cover chart with the 2.0x test line; the appendix table is unchanged.
What was checked
Read q3-portfolio-updates.docx: 14 companies
Read q3-valuation-bridge.xlsx: 3 scenarios
Draft slides from the Q2 template: 18 slides
Build the Q3 review deck from the updates doc and the valuation bridge. Same structure as Q2, the three flagged companies up front.
Reading the Q3 updates and the bridge workbook, then drafting from the Q2 template.
- Read q3-portfolio-updates.docx, 14 companies
- Read q3-valuation-bridge.xlsx, 3 scenarios
- Draft slides from the Q2 template, 18 slides
- Place the flagged companies first, Northwind, Fenwick, Alder
- Render q3-portfolio-review.pptx, 4.1 MB
- Wrote q3-portfolio-review.pptx, 4.1 MB
Deck is ready: 18 slides, the three variance companies on slides 3 to 5 with the covenant tests beside each, the full portfolio table in the appendix.
q3-portfolio-review.pptx4.1 MB · 18 slidesAdd the covenant headroom chart from the workbook to the Fenwick slide.
Added. Slide 5 now carries the interest-cover chart with the 2.0x test line; the appendix table is unchanged.
Questions
Which AI models can we use?
Context 1.5 and models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Kimi, DeepSeek and Qwen, from one switcher in every task. You can also add your own model endpoint.
What happens when we switch models?
The model is chosen per task, so switching changes only the model. Your files, channels and connected apps stay where they are in the workspace.
How is this different from one chat subscription?
You get every major model, shared files, connected apps and agents your whole team can mention in its channels, instead of one person's chat window.
What can Context create?
Agents write documents, sheets and decks into Drive under the task that made them, and you open and edit Word, Excel and PowerPoint files in the built-in editors.
Which tools can Context use?
Each person connects their own Slack, Google Workspace, Salesforce or GitHub account, and agents act with that account and its permissions.
How quickly can we get started?
Sign up and start on the Free plan the same day. Plus is $20 per person per month, and we can help set up the workspace around your first use case.


