Build, deploy, and improve AI agents.

Run them on your infrastructure, under your controls.

Get started Book a demo

Hundreds of exceptional teams build on Context

Case study1,600+production agent workflows

62%fewer escalations to field engineers

11kagent runs a day on one deployment

$18Min annual review hours returned to engineering

Context, execution, identity, and evals on one foundation. Everything agents need to work in production.

Modules for every role, tool, and use case.

One platform for people and agents.

Chat, files, tasks, skills, applets and evals in one product, shared by your team and the agents that work with it.

q3-portfolio-reviewThursday's review: updates, bridge, deck, covenant watch7

Messages FilesDetails

Today

Maya Okafor09:02

Review is Thursday. Priya, can you get the portfolio pack started? Same structure as Q2, and Northwind and Alder go in the risk section this time.

Priya Natarajan09:04

@Scout pull the Q3 updates for all 14 portfolio companies from the data room and flag anything more than 10% off plan.

Scout09:04

Q3 portfolio updates

Done in 6 min 12 s

Wrote q3-portfolio-updates.docx, 184 KB

q3-portfolio-updates.docxworkspaces/b/q3-portfolio-reviewDoc · 184 KB

Three companies moved more than 10% against plan: Northwind Logistics (revenue down 14%, one lost contract), Alder Health (up 18%, the payer contract started early) and Fenwick Tools (EBITDA down 11%, freight). Sources are linked in the doc.

Marco Vitale09:12

@Ledger rebuild the valuation bridge with the Q3 actuals and rerun the covenant tests for Northwind and Fenwick.

Ledger09:13

Q3 valuation bridge

Done in 4 min 40 s

Wrote q3-valuation-bridge.xlsx, 612 KB

q3-valuation-bridge.xlsxworkspaces/b/q3-portfolio-reviewSheet · 612 KB

Northwind passes leverage at 3.9x against a 4.5x covenant. Fenwick's interest cover is 2.1x with the test at 2.0x: passing, but tight. One tab per company in the workbook.

Send a message in #q3-portfolio-review

01
Work together
Ask for the deck in the team channel. Atlas, the team's analyst agent, reads the updates and the bridge, builds the slides, and the file lands in the thread when it is done.
02
Turn work into apps
Ask Ledger, the finance agent, to keep the covenant numbers where everyone can watch them. It builds an applet from the workbook, and the applet opens beside the channel.
03
Codify what works
Atlas, the analyst agent, built the deck from a skill: steps you can read and edit. Share the skill with the workspace and every agent follows the same steps.
04
Make it better every week
Every run is scored against your criteria. A failed criterion goes to the Improver, which writes a new version of the skill from that feedback, so the agents get better, cheaper and faster every week.
05
Any model, always improving
Pick the model each agent runs on. The skills, scorecards and improvements stay, so the work keeps getting better whichever model you choose.

Built for production work.

The Context on-prem appliance with its inference accelerator visible inside.

Run anywhere.

Hosted. Your VPC. Air-gapped. The on-prem Context appliance.

Use any model or agent.

Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, or open weights. Bring your own agent framework, or use ours.

acme-q4-diligence

Acme · Q4 review

Draft the diligence memo for Acme — focus on Q4 risks and growth signals.

Pulling Acme's Q4 financials, support tickets, and customer calls.

acme-q4-financials.csv+247 rows

Drafting risk signals and growth opportunities from the calls.

diligence-memo.docx+89 lines

Done — 3 risk signals, 2 growth opportunities flagged.

Ask anything (⌘L)

Research

Models

Claude 4.5 Sonnet

GPT-5

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Kimi K2

Llama 4 (custom)

Enterprise-grade authorization.

Identity through your IdP. Customer-managed keys. Audit on every action. Permissions inherited at every connector call.

Audit loglive

sarah.chenSnowflake

select · 47 tables in finance.sales

09:42

marcus.leeGoogle Drive

edit · Q4-memo.docx

09:38

priya.shahJira

comment · ENG-4421

09:36

ana.martinezSlack

post · #risk-review

09:34

acme-q4-diligence

diligence-memo.docx

Acme Q4 Diligence

Summary

Acme closed Q4 above plan on revenue, with margin compression from a one-time integration spend. Pipeline coverage for Q1 is healthy at 3.1x.

Risk signals

•Top-5 customer concentration up to 41%.

•Churn in mid-market segment ticked to 4.8%.

•DSO extended by 6 days versus Q3.

acme-q4-financials.xlsx

Metric

Revenue

$1.04M

$1.23M

OpEx

$0.71M

$0.88M

Margin

31.7%

28.5%

Pipeline

$3.1M

$3.9M

Churn

3.2%

4.8%

NPS

A complete working environment.

Documents, spreadsheets, decks, kanbans, and file viewers built in. Your team and agents work on the same files in the same environment.

Faster, cheaper, better

Self-improving models, agents, and skills deliver better outcomes at scale.

Task pass rate vs. weeks since deployment. Internal F100 enterprise benchmark: same task suite, rubric-graded, 3-run mean. Each system runs its vendor's default frontier model in its shipped configuration.

Faster turnaround

Lower cost per case

Custom models trained on your work

Your team's accepted outputs become training data for models you own and serve, and they beat general-purpose agents on your specific tasks.

Evals gate every change

Rubrics and golden sets validate every runbook, model, and context change against past work before it ships. Regressions are caught automatically.

Step-level model routing

Each step routes to the cheapest model that clears your rubric. Frontier models handle only the genuinely novel, so cost falls without losing quality.

The same model, better every week

Every run is scored, every failure improves a skill, and once a person approves the change, every run after it starts from there.

Agents do the work
Every task runs with the permissions of the person who asked, and every step is recorded.
Q3 portfolio review deck Files Share
You09:20
Build the Q3 review deck from the updates doc and the valuation bridge. Same structure as Q2, the three flagged companies up front.
Context09:20
Reading the Q3 updates and the bridge workbook, then drafting from the Q2 template.
Q3 portfolio review deck
Done in 3 min 48 s
Read q3-portfolio-updates.docx, 14 companies
Read q3-valuation-bridge.xlsx, 3 scenarios
Draft slides from the Q2 template, 18 slides
Place the flagged companies first, Northwind, Fenwick, Alder
Render q3-portfolio-review.pptx, 4.1 MB
Wrote q3-portfolio-review.pptx, 4.1 MB
Wrote q3-portfolio-review.pptx, 4.1 MB
q3-portfolio-review.pptxworkspaces/b/q3-portfolio-review-deckDeck · 4.1 MB
Context09:24
Deck is ready: 18 slides, the three variance companies on slides 3 to 5 with the covenant tests beside each, the full portfolio table in the appendix.
q3-portfolio-review.pptx4.1 MB · 18 slides
You09:31
Add the covenant headroom chart from the workbook to the Fenwick slide.
Context09:31
Added. Slide 5 now carries the interest-cover chart with the 2.0x test line; the appendix table is unchanged.
Share the deck with #q3-portfolio-review?
Posts q3-portfolio-review.pptx to the channel and notifies the four members.
ShareNot yet
Ask anything
CAuto
Evals score every run
Scorecards written by your own experts grade each run, so every failure has a name and a reason.
Q3 portfolio review deck
Atlas · Brindle Capital
Maya Okafor · Today 09:24
Workspace:
Brindle Capital
Avg Rating:
2.0
Feedback:
1
Messages:
6
Runs:
1
Attempts:
1
View Chat
Skills used:Quarterly portfolio review
Prompt
# Where this task came fromYou were dispatched by Atlas, a Together agent, from the public channel #q3-portfolio-review, at the request of Maya Okafor.
FeedbackExport Feedback CSV
Deck qualityProject FeedbackToday, 09:41
Flagged companies lead the deckYes
Covenant test beside each flagged companyNoPriya Natarajan · Fenwick's slide has no covenant chart.
Appendix table completeYes
Overall2 / 5
Additional FeedbackFenwick's slide has no covenant chart. The workbook's Fenwick tab holds the test.
Failures become better skills
A learning run reads the failed criteria, drafts the next version of the skill and tests it against past runs.
Quarterly portfolio review
Quarterly portfolio reviewSavedv3 1 improvement Improve RunSave
Reviewing 1 suggestion from the ImproverAccept allReject all
Quarterly portfolio review
Build the quarterly review deck from the updates doc and the valuation bridge, flagged companies first.
Scope
Brindle Capital
Tags
portfolio
Files
SKILL.md deck-template.pptx Add files
Connectors
+ Attach
Scorecards
Deck quality
Steps
Read the quarter's updates doc and the valuation bridge workbook.
Draft the slides from last quarter's template, one company per slide.
Place every company more than 10% off plan first, on slides 3 to 5.
Add the covenant chart from the workbook to each flagged company's slide.
Render the deck and post it to the review channel with the flagged companies named.
Written by
Atlas · from the Q3 review deck task
Every run starts from the fix
Once a person approves the new version, every run after it starts from that improvement, on any model.
Quarterly portfolio review
Quarterly portfolio reviewSavedv32/3 Improve RunSave
Version historyEvery save of this skill. Restore brings a version back as the newest one.
Version history
Version 3Saved by Maya Okafor · just nowCurrent
Version 2Saved by Atlas · 2h agoRestore
Version 1Saved by Atlas · 3d agoRestore
Quarterly portfolio review
Build the quarterly review deck from the updates doc and the valuation bridge, flagged companies first.
Scope
Brindle Capital
Tags
portfolio
Files
SKILL.md deck-template.pptx Add files
Connectors
+ Attach
Scorecards
Deck quality
Steps
Read the quarter's updates doc and the valuation bridge workbook.
Draft the slides from last quarter's template, one company per slide.
Place every company more than 10% off plan first, on slides 3 to 5.
Render the deck and post it to the review channel with the flagged companies named.
Written by
Atlas · from the Q3 review deck task

Task pass rate over four months, with one marker for each stage. Measured at Qualcomm: 23% to 98% over four months on the same model. The shape of the curve between those points is illustrative.